DiY

How to Build a Grant Database with Airtable

A practical guide to tracking funding opportunities using Airtable

Grant RadarAirtableMicrosoft Excel

A practical guide to tracking funding opportunities using Airtable

Keeping track of grant opportunities can quickly become overwhelming.

Researchers, innovation managers and grant consultants often monitor dozens—or even hundreds—of funding calls simultaneously. Each opportunity comes with its own deadlines, eligibility rules, budgets, priorities and application status.

Many teams turn to Airtable because it combines the simplicity of a spreadsheet with the flexibility of a database.

Can Airtable be used as a grant database?

Absolutely.

In fact, it is one of the most popular DIY solutions for organisations that want to build a customised funding tracker without investing in dedicated grant software.

This guide explains how to create an efficient grant database in Airtable and highlights where its strengths—and limitations—lie.

Step 1. Create a Funding Opportunities Table

The heart of your database is a table containing one record for each funding opportunity.

Typical fields include:

  • Programme (Horizon Europe, LIFE, Erasmus+, etc.)
  • Call title
  • Call identifier
  • Opening date
  • Submission deadline
  • Budget
  • Funding rate
  • Technology readiness level (TRL)
  • Research topics
  • Link to the official call
  • Current status (Monitoring, Preparing, Submitted, Closed)

This provides a central catalogue of all opportunities your organisation is following.

Step 2. Categorise Opportunities

As the database grows, categorisation becomes essential.

Useful fields include:

  • Scientific domain
  • Technology area
  • Keywords
  • Target market
  • Organisation type (SME, university, public body)
  • Geographic eligibility
  • Internal priority level

These categories make filtering and searching much easier.

Step 3. Track Your Pipeline

Airtable works particularly well for visualising the funding pipeline.

Typical workflow stages include:

  • New opportunity
  • Under review
  • Go / No-Go decision
  • Consortium building
  • Proposal drafting
  • Submitted
  • Awarded
  • Rejected

Using Kanban views, opportunities can easily be moved from one stage to another.

Step 4. Link Opportunities to Projects

One of Airtable's strengths is relational data.

Instead of storing everything in a single table, create separate tables for:

  • Funding opportunities
  • Projects
  • Organisations
  • Consortium partners
  • Contacts

Relationships between these tables provide a much richer overview of your grant portfolio.

Step 5. Create Personalised Views

Different stakeholders need different information.

For example:

Research managers may only want upcoming deadlines.

Consultants may need opportunities grouped by client.

Researchers may prefer calls filtered by scientific field.

Airtable views make it easy to present the same data in different ways without duplicating records.

Step 6. Automate Notifications

Airtable includes automation features that can reduce manual work.

Typical automations include:

  • Reminder before submission deadlines
  • Notification when a new opportunity reaches a specific status
  • Assignment of opportunities to team members
  • Automatic updates of review dates

While not as advanced as specialised workflow software, these automations cover many everyday needs.

Step 7. Build Dashboards

Using Airtable Interfaces, organisations can build dashboards showing:

  • Upcoming deadlines
  • Opportunities by programme
  • Proposal success rates
  • Active submissions
  • Funding pipeline

These dashboards provide useful management visibility without requiring complex business intelligence tools.

Advantages of Using Airtable

Airtable has become popular because it combines flexibility with ease of use.

Extremely customisable

Every organisation can design a database that reflects its own workflow.

Easy to learn

Users familiar with spreadsheets usually become productive quickly.

Strong relational capabilities

Unlike Excel, Airtable naturally links related datasets together.

Good collaboration

Multiple users can work simultaneously while maintaining a single source of truth.

Automation support

Routine administrative tasks can be partially automated.

Limitations to Consider

Despite its flexibility, Airtable remains a general-purpose platform.

Manual data entry

Funding opportunities generally need to be entered or imported manually.

Keeping the database current can become time-consuming.

No automatic funding intelligence

Airtable does not search funding portals or detect newly published calls by itself.

Limited grant-specific functionality

Fields such as eligibility rules, expected impacts or consortium requirements must be designed manually.

Maintenance effort grows over time

As hundreds of opportunities accumulate, maintaining data quality requires ongoing discipline.

Digital Sovereignty Considerations

Airtable is a US-based cloud platform.

For many organisations, this is perfectly acceptable. However, some European universities, public organisations and companies increasingly evaluate software through the lens of digital sovereignty, data governance and long-term control over strategic information.

If these considerations are important, organisations may wish to assess whether a dedicated European solution better aligns with their internal policies.

A More Automated Alternative

Airtable is an excellent platform for building a custom grant database, particularly for organisations that enjoy designing their own workflows.

Its main limitation is that the database only contains the information you add yourself.

Dedicated solutions such as Grant Radar take a different approach. Instead of requiring users to build and maintain their own funding database, Grant Radar continuously aggregates funding opportunities and allows users to search, filter and monitor calls without manually entering data. Researchers and innovation teams can therefore spend less time maintaining databases and more time evaluating opportunities.

For organisations that appreciate Airtable's flexibility, the two approaches can even complement each other: Grant Radar can serve as the funding intelligence layer, while Airtable continues to manage internal decision-making or business-specific workflows.

Final Thoughts

Building a grant database in Airtable is an effective DIY solution for organisations that want complete flexibility over how funding opportunities are organised.

Its relational structure, collaborative features and automation capabilities make it significantly more powerful than a traditional spreadsheet.

However, flexibility comes with responsibility. The database must be maintained, updated and governed over time.

As funding landscapes become larger and more dynamic, many organisations eventually complement their custom database with specialised grant discovery software that reduces manual maintenance while providing access to continuously updated funding opportunities.